SpencerBarron.com

In 1816, the winter seemed to never end. In New England, ice on river banks was still visible in July and August. The year came to be known as ‘1800 and froze to death’ or ‘the poverty year’. It seems 2008, while much warmer and comfortable temperature wise, will be the year of poverty for many in the real estate industry. The year the real estate market never really came out of the winter slow down.

The real estate market usually is subject to certain cyclical phenomena that vary by area. In Denver, winter usually brings a slowdown in the real estate market, marked by slightly lower prices and sales volume. Typically as early as January or February the seasonal market begins to turn around. Well..not this year.

This chart is a stochastic representation of real estate sales prices over the last couple years. I love technical analysis, almost to a fault. In evaluating stocks, charts like these help traders identify trends and compare the current market price to past prices to identify opportunities. To keep it simple, when the blue line crosses up through the red line, this marks the best time to buy in the market. When the blue line crosses down through the red line that’s when you should sell. When prices go one way when the stochastic suggests another, that’s when there might be a trend reversal coming.

Imagine how many REALTOR friends you would have if you bought and sold that often. Thankfully, this model is usually only applied to stocks. A stock’s liquidity makes it possible for it to be bought and sold in shortened time spans. While it is a poor tool for evaluating the length of a trend and potential buying opportunities, it’s great at determining cycles and safer entry and exit points.

Here are a few things you might notice by examining your market in this way.
1. When is typically the best time of year to buy a home? If we look at the chart, it becomes obvious that the best time to buy a home would be between August and February. Of course, if you look at the actually sales stats, you would notice that August might just be the best month to buy a home during the year because not only is there a slight drop in pricing, there is a larger supply of homes to chose from. Deep down, I would never suggest that you rely on the time of year as the number one reason to buy or sell a home, but it always helps to know where you’re at in the cycle so you know what to expect.

2. How has the credit crunch affected home sales in Denver? From my observations, the availability of credit for lower income and even middle income buyers with lower credit scores has significantly slowed the market. Notice how the chart shows a longer, flatter curve all the way into April (2008) compared to previous years with the market bottoming between December and February. This means sellers can expect continued pressure on high home prices. It doesn’t mean things aren’t selling, it just means your going to need to work harder, show better and price lower than you used to.

3. How long will this last? Who really knows. I wouldn’t expect to see stability return next year at this time without significant improvements in the economy. (I here Microsoft wants more sun and is considering Denver…not really but that’s the instant boom I’m looking for.) Additionally, if REALTOR’s out there still think next year will be better, think again. Foreclosures are driving the market down by far out weighing the slowing local economy. Until lender owned inventory starts drying up, expect more of the incredible buying opportunities and poor selling prices. That being said, I’m keeping an eye on the price of ownership when compared to renting, the ratio of home prices to median income, the economy and inflation. There are encouraging signs and improving signs in many of these statistics.

If you saw one of my previous posts regarding the real estate bubble, you would know I don’t believe Denver is a true bubble candidate and thus has a shorter fall. I would expect that prices would continue to decline through Spring of 2009 finally bottoming during that Summer. I wouldn’t expect an immediate recovery either. Prices will likely stabilize before racing back up. Denver homes will start to look pretty affordable by spring of 2010. To arrive at that, you have to make a few leaps of faith regarding inflation, demand and foreclosures peaking this summer. But I’m sure I’m still more accurate than NAR’s method.
Sometimes though, an opportunity can come along that would likely never come again. Housing is very inconsistent and resists almost every opportunity to have an absolute value price. Most great opportunities will appear only for a couple of days before a savvy waiting investor would pounce. At this moment there are hundreds of homes in Denver that didn’t last a week on the market before being snatched up. If it’s a good deal, it’s a good deal. Who cares if you could of saved $5000 here or there when you get what you want and it has a great long term outlook either for you and your family, your pocket book or both?

Not to mention, the smart money loves these down turns. They need them to get into positions they couldn’t normally get into in strong upswings.

A long bottom can represent a real opportunity for some people in some areas. Of course, in most instances, we don’t usually refer to ourselves as the smart money, though we all wish it to be true.

 

A study released on October 31,2007 by S&P Case-Shiller shows Denver leading the country in price appreciation.  While the numbers are not staggering, Denver’s subtle growth marks a stark contrast from the drastic price drops of other cities across the United States.

Read the rest of this entry »

While I think many Realtors in Denver probably already knew this, it seems buyers are coming out of the woodwork.

Denver Metrolist is reporting good news for buyers and sellers alike. While days on market have gone up significantly from last year, 14% over last year to 117 days, so did ’solds’. Sold listings for January were up almost 25% since this time last year. (statistics from Denver Metrolist for the month of January 2007) Good news for buyers? Well, prices were down a touch as well compared to last year at this time.

I like to think that activity in January is a harbinger of what the first half of the year will be like. It’s been a busy couple of weeks for me. I’d imagine that many agents around Denver are breathing a sigh of relief if the same thing is happening to them. It’s almost as if the market was artificially supressed by poor media coverage. I haven’t heard anything horribly bad in weeks.

I’m not saying that all is warm and fuzzy. January’s DSNews (Default Servicing magazine) reports that Colorado’s foreclosure rate is 2.7 times the national average. Look out Douglas and Weld, you have a new contender for top foreclosure county. Adams County now tops the list with 1 foreclosure for every 132 households. But the truth is, this is actually an improvement from where it’s been.

My Real Estate Market predictions:

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that the job market and commercial office markets are healthier than they’ve been in years. Real estate will always be based on what’s going on locally. In particular, the job market has more to do with how the real estate market will do next year than interest rates will ever have. More jobs will mean fewer defaults on loans. And higher incomes mean higher home values. If buyers can afford to buy a limited supply of quality homes in desirable areas, prices will go up, and vice versa. So if there are jobs in Denver, I’d imagine home prices will remain stable or even show modest growth. Look for areas like Sunnyside, Berkeley, Bonnie Brae, DU, Cherry Creek, Cherry Hills Village, Greenwood Village, Englewood and Washington Park to see continued growth (1-3% this year), while areas like Highlands Ranch, Green Valley Ranch (Denver), Park Hill (Denver), Northglenn, Thornton and Southwest Denver will show some declines as high inventory and foreclosures put pressure on sellers to drop prices (2-5%).

Technorati Tags: Denver, Real, Estate, Statistics, Foreclosures,

What should be in a comparative market analysis (CMA)? A CMA shouldn’t be just a list of solds or actives. It should reflect the current conditions of the market. I was recently asked how long I felt a CMA was accurate and personally, in this market, I don’t think I would want to blindly price a home off a CMA I completed even two months ago. In most cases, my paranoia leads me to double-check solds and similar active listings even an hour before driving over to take a listing. There is a huge disparity in home pricing mainly because brokers use a wide range of largely ineffective models to determine pricing.

What I would look for in a Comparative Market Analysis (CMA).

1. New Sold Comps - This one is obvious but probably one of the most overrated when it comes to pricing. I don’t think this is the most important factor in pricing, but it’s important because once buyers have found that they liked your home more than the competition, this is where they will look to see if you’re worth it. You don’t have to be priced less if you can justify it, but both the initial offer and the appraisal will be based on this. Because of this, and to make sure you will appeal to the buyers in the market, you need to be priced in the ballpark that your buyer is looking in. Be prepared with a list of sold comparable homes and a justification of the price based on the homes’ differences. Sold data will likely not show a significant change over a short time frame and usually one low or high sale isn’t enough to support pricing.
2. New Competition - How many similar homes are you competing against? What does it cost to buy the other home? How do you compare to what is currently for sale? Lots of competition? It can have a huge effect on time on market and how much you’ll get for your home. If another seller comes on the market and prices below your home it will reduce your ability to compete at a higher price. Unless, of course, your home is truly different in a substantial way, this is not very likely when your home was a new construction home in a subdivision full of homes just like yours. How you compare to other homes that your potential buyers will be looking at is the most important factor in determining price.
3. Changing Absorption rates - This is a measure of how long the current inventory would take to sell if no new homes were added to the mix. Demand varies seasonally and as the result of the weather (super obvious) and the school year, as well as economic pressures and even poor media coverage of the market. Supply also varies greatly, peaking in the summer in most cities. It’s a great indicator, especially when applied directly to the homes of similar type.
4. Change in Days on Market before a sale - It’s also much easier for most people to grasp when compared to other indicators, but it’s one of those pieces of information that gets abused. Unfortunately, just because something sells quickly doesn’t mean it was under-priced. It could have just been the best home that the buyer was able to get an offer accepted on when they were looking. (see #2) There are too many variables to use the fast sale of a recently-sold property to support the idea that your home should sell for more. I find that of the homes that sell quickly, they usually don’t sell to some new buyer that just wandered by. Most new listings sell quickly when they are priced right when compared to what’s available. Buyers usually look around before they’re ready to buy. The homes that sell quickly likely sold to someone who was looking for a while already and recognized that the home was priced appropriately.

What is most disturbing though is the vast majority of sellers already have a price in their head that they want. Of course, I’m usually willing to hear why the seller thinks his home is worth the pie-in-the-sky price. They are usually trying to compare their home to homes with extra bathrooms, a finished basement, or more square footage. Even worse, many work backwards from how much they want to walk away from the closing table with or what they owe to arrive at their number.

For me though, I believe that the CMA’s should give you a range of what pricing will be acceptable to the market. It should also indicate where offers are being accepted when compared to the list price and what concessions (if any) are common. For Denver, as a general rule, most Denver homes homes sell within 2-3% of their current list price and buyers get less than 1% in concessions. Most also sell within 10% of their original list price of the current listing period. That means most homes priced more than 10% higher than what comparable homes would sell for usually end up expiring without a sale. In case you missed it, most Denver Homes are overpriced on average of 20% when compared to the average list price of the solds.

In the end, it comes down to the feeling you get walking in the door. The same feeling the buyer will get. Look at the competition and know what price can be justified. That’s the only way you can nail down the real value.

Also see: How to sell your home quickly for top dollar.

Technorati Tags: Denver, Real, Estate, CMA, Selling_A_Home, Pricing

How about that. I actually got quoted in Money Magazine. Albeit my statement appears a bit truncated, it is not incorrect. I’m quoted as saying “People offer higher commissions because it works”. I’ll stand by that. Offering a higher commission to a buyer’s agent does help sell your home. It doesn’t necessarily help you get a better price but it will get you slightly more traffic. I’ll explain, but first, this is what I’m talking about. The February 2007 Article entitled “Is your Realtor on your Side?” by Stephen Gandel discusses the value of having a buyer’s agent. More than that, it actually gets into the morality of the strategies some homeowners and builders are using to sell their homes. 

Steve’s seems to be trying to get his fingers on the pulse of real estate but can’t seem to get past the waiting room. I spoke with Steve on the phone after he wrote an article in the December issue of Money Magazine, “Best Ideas for 2007″. I had disagreed with him on many of the assertions he had made regarding strategies buyers could use to get a better deal. To be fair, I agreed strongly with his suggestions for sellers. In our conversation, he admitted that he ‘doesn’t have access to the same information that agents have’. Thus he has to “rely on other people” in order to write these real estate articles. He’s essentially trying to analyze data from hundreds of markets and collate that into advice that could be applicable nationwide.  He’s not an expert in the sense of personal experience but rather is forced to rely on so-called experts from across the country to give him accurate information regarding the stories he researches in order to make the valuable conclusions. I’m honored that I can fall into that category. Unfortunately, I disagree with some of the advice in the latest article. It seems the article plays more to what buyers would want to believe rather than the truth about what will help get you a better deal.  But then again,  who knows what agents across the country tell him.  This is how it works in Denver and what I disagreed with…

(If your not sure what commissions are and how they work, check the end of this post)

 Why would offering more money to a buyers agent work? Because brokers want to make a living and will be more likely to show your place in among others of the same type. This is often true in the case in newer condos or builder-owned homes where there is often a lot of competition. If you have ten other condos in your building that are essentially the same home at the same price, and then there are lots of other condos in other buildings, most agents want to narrow down what building their client wants before showing them everything that is available in one building. There are literally hundreds of condos that are similar. Do you want to go view all of them or would you like someone to help narrow it down? Most people would like some help here. Well, if I have to pick which one to show first, and they appear all the same, why wouldn’t I pick the one that pays me better, especially if they’re are all priced the same? That’s just good business. 

Unfortunately for sellers, this doesn’t seem to bring them a higher price, it just gets you more showings and helps to sell your home faster. From all the home sales I analyzed to prepare my information for Steve, I noticed that of the homes that had higher commissions sold slightly faster than homes that didn’t.  It’s not obvious when looking at homes offering co-ops slightly higher than the average because often that money is being offered to get brokers to overlook the obvious problems with the home and bring someone by.  While it might not have been as clear in the ’slightly more’ group that higher commissions bring faster sales, it definately becomes clear in the ’slightly less’ group.  When you offer less than the average commission, there is a marked difference in time on market.

I took a look at this and noticed that time on market goes up immediately when offering even slightly less than the average co-op.  Days on market increased by 12% when agents offered less than the average co-op.  This can affect the sale price since a long time on the market is viewed poorly.   Read the rest of this entry »

That’s not new though. Buyer’s market, seller’s market, blah blah blah. What does it mean really? Homes are always overpriced. Always have been.

Most homes are overpriced. Through good and bad, sellers usually overprice their homes. The average active list price for a single family home in Denver for 2006 was 20% higher than the average list price of the homes that sell. That’s why in a typical month between 5% and 10% of all listings on the market expire without selling.

Sellers need time to soften up. Most sellers don’t let their home go for much less than the asking price in Denver. A typical Denver home sells for 2% less than the list price.

Read the rest of this entry »

Just for fun, I wanted to take the pricing data stats from my previous post about market timing and apply a slow stochastic to the prices.

Here’s essentially how they work with stocks.

On the lower part of the image is an example of a slow stochastic. A buy signal is interpreted when the %k (green line) crosses up over the %d (white line). This is most important when value is crossing up from 30. A sell signal is the opposite. When %k is crossing down over %d from 75 (numbers on left). Go ahead and ignore the right numbers and red line for now. Essentially stochastics are trailing indicators of price trends. Trading decisions should never be made entirely from an indicator. It’s just an illustration of a trend over a time period. Depending on the time period you’re looking at, long-term and short-term trends can be identified.

Now, that being said. Here’s a slow stochastic showing short term (seasonal) market trends for the Denver Real Estate Market.

The stochastic demonstrates the change in price trends

Read the rest of this entry »

Of course, the standard Realtor response is ‘it’s always a good time to sell’. I’ve even heard agents say that the holidays have no effect on sales. I personally think that is just a sales pitch to make them look good, because the statistics are fairly clear. It definitely looks cyclical to me.

If you’re looking for a serious answer, though, you want it based on fact. Buyers and sellers don’t care if you closed a deal this month, they just want to know the truth about when is the best time to buy and sell a home. I’ve been reviewing the year end statistics for 2006. I’m of course looking in order to give my clients a better understanding of what to expect next year but some things are jumping out at me. We see DOM reaching a new high in December for Denver as a whole. But let’s focus on the topic of market timing. First off, at what time of year do home sellers get the highest price?

These are the average home prices for Denver over the last 3 years. You’ll notice that Read the rest of this entry »